-
5th October 2003, 09:09 PM
#1
the rules, updated by Sir Chris 4-7-04
Originally posted by ralts_mudkip
All the rules look pretty just to me, but don't you think you should add to rule #6 that if the person who had made the claim added substantial proof to back up his/her claim, then the thread would not be closed?
if there substantial proof it isnt a wild claim, and thus isnt against the rules, but a discovery
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-