Chieng Vui Leng
14th October 2005, 11:54 PM
This is a long story, and I am seeking opinions from you.
A bit of a background here: I am Malaysian, but I studied in Singapore since I was 7. I attended the Anglo-Chinese School, which consists of 5 units: 2 Primary Schools, ACS(Junior) and ACS(Primary); 2 Secondary Schools, ACS(Barker Road) and ACS(Independent); and a college, Anglo-Chinese Junior College.
I studied in ACS(Primary) from 1995 to 2000, followed by ACS(Independent) from 2001 to 2004, and after that came to Australia to continue my studies.
I am writing about Mr Peter Tan, the principal of Anglo-Chinese School (Junior). I have been having conflicts with him and his Vice-Principal, Miss Bok Hai Choo, since last year.
I used to know Mr Tan well - I was actually from ACS(Primary), not ACS(Junior), but I do know quite a few teachers there - I first visited ACS(J) in 2002 on hearing that Mr Chandrajit Yadav (who taught me at ACS(P) as a trainee teacher in 1999) was teaching there. Through Mr Yadav, I got to know many other teachers there. I also met Mr Tan, who was very friendly, and he even told me that I had "grown taller" on a subsequent visit, which is the highest compliment anyone can pay me.
What soured our relationship occurred the following year - I could not get along with some of my neighbours and my Mum warned me, saying that they may complain to my school. I decided to strike first by complaining to their school, which was ACS(J). However, Mr Tan was very rude about it and told me "as long as the incident in question takes place outside school, we have no control over it." Take note of this statement, more on that later.
Besides, the receptionists were very rude and unfriendly too. There were many other ex-students visiting, and they allowed them to stay but kept asking me to leave. I know I am technically not an ex-student of ACS(J), but it is still ACS, isn't it?
What also stunned me was that Mr Tan refused to entertain my complaints. If people complained to Dr Ong - the principal of my then school, which was ACS(I) - he would definitely have taken action against the students in question. I have witnessed quite a few people being caned as a result of public feedback.
In November 2003, the school was having a graduation cum campfire night for the Primary Six (final year of Primary School) students and I dropped in, and Mr Tan was perfectly friendly again. Sometime before Chinese New Year the following year (which was just last year), I visited the school to deliver three greeting cards, one to all the teachers of ACS(J), thanking them for all their assistance with my neighbours last year (though not much was provided), and the other two to certain friends that I know in the school. I walked pass the reception counter and passed the stuff to the Vice-Principal, Ms Sharon Liat, who told me she would have to pass them to Mr Tan first. She was reasonably friendly so I thought I was home and dry. How very wrong I was.
After Chinese New Year, I went back to ACS(J) again to check if the cards had been successfully delivered. I tried to go to see Ms Liat again but the receptionist stopped and even scolded me, when she did not seem to mind the previous time. She was being very inconsistent here.
About a week later, I went back to ACS(J) a third time to check if the cards had been delivered, as I had been unsuccessful the previous time. Although I did not walk in like I did before, the receptionist got Mr Peter Tan out, and he started yelling his head off at me, spraying me with flecks of spit. I tried to apologize and explain myself, but he was totally beyond reason. In the end, I gave up and left.
The purpose of my visit was to check if the cards had been successfully passed to the respective recipients, and instead I got a scolding from the principal. What amazed me more is that he dared to complain to the principal of my own school, when he himself refused to entertain my complaints about some of his students. He himself declared that "as long as the incident in question takes place outside school, we have no control over it". Why then, does he complain to my school over an incident that happened more than 6km outside? I was not even wearing school uniform then.
Miss Bok Hai Choo, who was then my teacher at ACS(I) and has since been posted to ACS(J) as 2nd Vice-Principal on secondment, told me that I "was being rude to him", when it was actually the other way round. He was the one who was ranting and raving at me. I did not lose my temper, raise my voice or even so much as frown at him. I see no reason why I, and not him, should have been put in the blame.
It was not over then. In May this year Security guards have been implemented at ACS(J), and this is "in accordance with the MOE", so says Mr Tan.
In July this year, my family was on holiday in Singapore and it was my mid-year break then, so I went back for a short holiday. We happened to stay near ACS(J), and one evening my brother and I were taking a walk around the area. As we passed the school gate, I just said 'hi' to the security guard on duty, and in return I got a fierce glare. If looks could kill, I would have been dead.
My brother and I stopped a little way off to sit and talk as we had not seen each other for four months. We were totally outside the school compound, but even so, the security guard approached us and asked our business. Scared, we told him a cock-and-bull story of waiting for a friend’s younger brother. But he kept probing us for information and in the end chased us away.
Even the 2nd Vice-Principal, Miss Bok Hai Choo, is inconsistent. She keeps insisting that Mr Tan "has forgiven me" where the incident that occurred last year in concerned. However, whenever I meet up with her, she does not follow the normal procedure. I got a Customer Service Officer from the Ministry of Education to check with Mr Tan what is with the tight security sometime last month, and she was told that if a staff member of the school is meeting someone, he or she is to give the person’s name to the security guard, who will let the person in and exchange his or her ID card for a visitor’s pass.
However, Miss Bok insists on coming outside to meet me instead. I had just come back from Melbourne after four months and was suffering from the sweltering heat, but she refused to bring me into the comforts of her air-conditioned office, but rather come out and melt along with me. I see plain and gross inconsistency here. Furthermore, when I emailed Miss Bok about the security guard incident, she refused point-blank to entertain.
I feel that Mr Tan and Miss Bok are lacking in the qualities of a good Principal and Vice-Principal respectively, and as a member of the public I am not happy. I think they owe me an explanation here.
Time for analysis. Miss Bok keeps telling me that Mr Tan "has forgiven" me over the tiff that we had had. However, she refuses to let me see him to get a proper closure of the matter. Mind you, it haunts me a lot. Even when I meet up with her, she insists on meeting me outside in the sweltering heat, rather than bring me into her air-conditioned office. If Mr Tan has indeed forgiven me, why does she do this? Isn't it a bit weird?
I questioned her many times over the email, and she said as a Christian I "should not insist, but choose to obey". Well, ACS is a Methodist Institution, one of the criteria of being a leader is to be staunchly anchored in the Christian faith, which Miss Bok is. Then, why does she insist? Why doesn't she choose to obey like she said? She really needs to learn how to practise what she preaches -- and this can be tied in with her not following the normal procedure when meeting me.
To sidetrack a little, I will give some background information on why we meet each other in the first place. She was my teacher as well as counselor back at ACS(I), and has helped me out a lot. We were quite close then, and our original plan was to keep in touch. However, her promotion seems to have pushed her head into the clouds, and made her conceited.
When I threatened to complain to the MOE, she actually told me "do not cross your boundaries". Now, who does she think she is? I am no longer her student, she cannot expel me anyway. Because of that I sent in my letter of complaint straightaway. It remains to be seen how they will look into it. Hopefully both she and Mr Tan will be sacked. :wink:
Two more points: the security guard incident. I just said 'hi' to him and he had to give me a look as if he were going to kill me. Certainly the security guards at Melbourne University are not like that. The security guards at College Square, the hostel where I stay, are very nice too. And I was not even trying to enter the school, I was just sitting at a bench near the gate, with my brother, talking, smoking, I don't see why he had to chase us away. :mad:
Now, the purpose of this post is to do a survey on neutral ground, to find out exactly how someone reading my letter of complaint (which this post was adapted from) will think.
Please state your opinions about my story in your replies (no offensive remarks please). Thanks for taking the time to read this.
A bit of a background here: I am Malaysian, but I studied in Singapore since I was 7. I attended the Anglo-Chinese School, which consists of 5 units: 2 Primary Schools, ACS(Junior) and ACS(Primary); 2 Secondary Schools, ACS(Barker Road) and ACS(Independent); and a college, Anglo-Chinese Junior College.
I studied in ACS(Primary) from 1995 to 2000, followed by ACS(Independent) from 2001 to 2004, and after that came to Australia to continue my studies.
I am writing about Mr Peter Tan, the principal of Anglo-Chinese School (Junior). I have been having conflicts with him and his Vice-Principal, Miss Bok Hai Choo, since last year.
I used to know Mr Tan well - I was actually from ACS(Primary), not ACS(Junior), but I do know quite a few teachers there - I first visited ACS(J) in 2002 on hearing that Mr Chandrajit Yadav (who taught me at ACS(P) as a trainee teacher in 1999) was teaching there. Through Mr Yadav, I got to know many other teachers there. I also met Mr Tan, who was very friendly, and he even told me that I had "grown taller" on a subsequent visit, which is the highest compliment anyone can pay me.
What soured our relationship occurred the following year - I could not get along with some of my neighbours and my Mum warned me, saying that they may complain to my school. I decided to strike first by complaining to their school, which was ACS(J). However, Mr Tan was very rude about it and told me "as long as the incident in question takes place outside school, we have no control over it." Take note of this statement, more on that later.
Besides, the receptionists were very rude and unfriendly too. There were many other ex-students visiting, and they allowed them to stay but kept asking me to leave. I know I am technically not an ex-student of ACS(J), but it is still ACS, isn't it?
What also stunned me was that Mr Tan refused to entertain my complaints. If people complained to Dr Ong - the principal of my then school, which was ACS(I) - he would definitely have taken action against the students in question. I have witnessed quite a few people being caned as a result of public feedback.
In November 2003, the school was having a graduation cum campfire night for the Primary Six (final year of Primary School) students and I dropped in, and Mr Tan was perfectly friendly again. Sometime before Chinese New Year the following year (which was just last year), I visited the school to deliver three greeting cards, one to all the teachers of ACS(J), thanking them for all their assistance with my neighbours last year (though not much was provided), and the other two to certain friends that I know in the school. I walked pass the reception counter and passed the stuff to the Vice-Principal, Ms Sharon Liat, who told me she would have to pass them to Mr Tan first. She was reasonably friendly so I thought I was home and dry. How very wrong I was.
After Chinese New Year, I went back to ACS(J) again to check if the cards had been successfully delivered. I tried to go to see Ms Liat again but the receptionist stopped and even scolded me, when she did not seem to mind the previous time. She was being very inconsistent here.
About a week later, I went back to ACS(J) a third time to check if the cards had been delivered, as I had been unsuccessful the previous time. Although I did not walk in like I did before, the receptionist got Mr Peter Tan out, and he started yelling his head off at me, spraying me with flecks of spit. I tried to apologize and explain myself, but he was totally beyond reason. In the end, I gave up and left.
The purpose of my visit was to check if the cards had been successfully passed to the respective recipients, and instead I got a scolding from the principal. What amazed me more is that he dared to complain to the principal of my own school, when he himself refused to entertain my complaints about some of his students. He himself declared that "as long as the incident in question takes place outside school, we have no control over it". Why then, does he complain to my school over an incident that happened more than 6km outside? I was not even wearing school uniform then.
Miss Bok Hai Choo, who was then my teacher at ACS(I) and has since been posted to ACS(J) as 2nd Vice-Principal on secondment, told me that I "was being rude to him", when it was actually the other way round. He was the one who was ranting and raving at me. I did not lose my temper, raise my voice or even so much as frown at him. I see no reason why I, and not him, should have been put in the blame.
It was not over then. In May this year Security guards have been implemented at ACS(J), and this is "in accordance with the MOE", so says Mr Tan.
In July this year, my family was on holiday in Singapore and it was my mid-year break then, so I went back for a short holiday. We happened to stay near ACS(J), and one evening my brother and I were taking a walk around the area. As we passed the school gate, I just said 'hi' to the security guard on duty, and in return I got a fierce glare. If looks could kill, I would have been dead.
My brother and I stopped a little way off to sit and talk as we had not seen each other for four months. We were totally outside the school compound, but even so, the security guard approached us and asked our business. Scared, we told him a cock-and-bull story of waiting for a friend’s younger brother. But he kept probing us for information and in the end chased us away.
Even the 2nd Vice-Principal, Miss Bok Hai Choo, is inconsistent. She keeps insisting that Mr Tan "has forgiven me" where the incident that occurred last year in concerned. However, whenever I meet up with her, she does not follow the normal procedure. I got a Customer Service Officer from the Ministry of Education to check with Mr Tan what is with the tight security sometime last month, and she was told that if a staff member of the school is meeting someone, he or she is to give the person’s name to the security guard, who will let the person in and exchange his or her ID card for a visitor’s pass.
However, Miss Bok insists on coming outside to meet me instead. I had just come back from Melbourne after four months and was suffering from the sweltering heat, but she refused to bring me into the comforts of her air-conditioned office, but rather come out and melt along with me. I see plain and gross inconsistency here. Furthermore, when I emailed Miss Bok about the security guard incident, she refused point-blank to entertain.
I feel that Mr Tan and Miss Bok are lacking in the qualities of a good Principal and Vice-Principal respectively, and as a member of the public I am not happy. I think they owe me an explanation here.
Time for analysis. Miss Bok keeps telling me that Mr Tan "has forgiven" me over the tiff that we had had. However, she refuses to let me see him to get a proper closure of the matter. Mind you, it haunts me a lot. Even when I meet up with her, she insists on meeting me outside in the sweltering heat, rather than bring me into her air-conditioned office. If Mr Tan has indeed forgiven me, why does she do this? Isn't it a bit weird?
I questioned her many times over the email, and she said as a Christian I "should not insist, but choose to obey". Well, ACS is a Methodist Institution, one of the criteria of being a leader is to be staunchly anchored in the Christian faith, which Miss Bok is. Then, why does she insist? Why doesn't she choose to obey like she said? She really needs to learn how to practise what she preaches -- and this can be tied in with her not following the normal procedure when meeting me.
To sidetrack a little, I will give some background information on why we meet each other in the first place. She was my teacher as well as counselor back at ACS(I), and has helped me out a lot. We were quite close then, and our original plan was to keep in touch. However, her promotion seems to have pushed her head into the clouds, and made her conceited.
When I threatened to complain to the MOE, she actually told me "do not cross your boundaries". Now, who does she think she is? I am no longer her student, she cannot expel me anyway. Because of that I sent in my letter of complaint straightaway. It remains to be seen how they will look into it. Hopefully both she and Mr Tan will be sacked. :wink:
Two more points: the security guard incident. I just said 'hi' to him and he had to give me a look as if he were going to kill me. Certainly the security guards at Melbourne University are not like that. The security guards at College Square, the hostel where I stay, are very nice too. And I was not even trying to enter the school, I was just sitting at a bench near the gate, with my brother, talking, smoking, I don't see why he had to chase us away. :mad:
Now, the purpose of this post is to do a survey on neutral ground, to find out exactly how someone reading my letter of complaint (which this post was adapted from) will think.
Please state your opinions about my story in your replies (no offensive remarks please). Thanks for taking the time to read this.