PDA

View Full Version : Were all psychic! But you probably knew that...



Jeff
6th September 2006, 07:51 PM
NORWICH, England (Reuters) -- Many people have experienced the phenomenon of receiving a telephone call from someone shortly after thinking about them -- now a scientist says he has proof of what he calls telephone telepathy.

Rupert Sheldrake, whose research is funded by the respected Trinity College, Cambridge, said on Tuesday he had conducted experiments that proved that such precognition existed for telephone calls and even e-mails.

Each person in the trials was asked to give researchers names and phone numbers of four relatives or friends. These were then called at random and told to ring the subject who had to identify the caller before answering the phone.

"The hit rate was 45 percent, well above the 25 percent you would have expected," he told the annual meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science.

"The odds against this being a chance effect are 1,000 billion to one."

He said he found the same result with people being asked to name one of four people sending them an e-mail before it had landed.

However, his sample was small on both trials -- just 63 people for the controlled telephone experiment and 50 for the email -- and only four subjects were actually filmed in the phone study and five in the email, prompting some skepticism.

Undeterred, Sheldrake -- who believes in the interconnectedness of all minds within a social grouping -- said that he was extending his experiments to see if the phenomenon also worked for mobile phone text messages.


http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/09/05/telepathy.reut/index.html?section=cnn_topstories

So someone actually "proved" this? Sometimes I wonder about some of these "researchers"...

mr_pikachu
6th September 2006, 08:08 PM
Hmm. The small sample size is concerning, I must admit, as is the lack of corroborating evidence. Did Sheldrake have any partners in his research, or has that information been disclosed?

I'm also a bit concerned by the use of the word "proof." Any good scientist can tell you that you can't ever have "proof" of anything - the whole point of scientific theory is that new evidence can overrule old ideas. Either that's bad reporting by Reuters, or I have even more reason to doubt this guy.

Not that I don't trust the theory itself, but I hesitate to trust the study.

Dark-San
7th September 2006, 01:07 AM
[b][size=3]It has a lot of doubts in it. Anyone who had done the module on Market Research will tell you that 63 is a small number to play around with if you want to conclude as in the 'whole' human race.

Another thing to consider would be that if the 63 people in the experiement covering other ethnic groups? It needs further provings if we are to determine this as a fact.

RedStarWarrior
8th September 2006, 08:32 AM
Trinity College, Cambridge, must love wasting money on stupid research projects.

mr_pikachu
8th September 2006, 01:50 PM
I honestly don't think it's a bad idea. But I do think that the research was conducted poorly, and the idea of "proof" makes the whole thing dubious.