Last Exile
22nd June 2004, 08:12 PM
I've checked with several sources and I'm convinced:
HE CHEATED! AND THE JUDGES KNEW AND INTENTIONALLY LET HIM GET AWAY WITH IT!
What happened:
In the previous match, Pascall's opponent, Cory, still has Pascal's Magical Scientist, in his deck.
Pascal duels my friend Jason in the semis. Pascal wins 2-1. After duel, Cory coems up and says he had Pascal's Magical Scientist in his deck. Pascal says yes, it wasn't in his deck, and that he didn't replace it with another card, therefore having 40 isntead of 41 cards. Therefore Pascal had 1 less card than he claimed. 15 other people that day got an automatic 1st duel loss for similiar incidences. What happens to Pascal?
Judge discussion:
Sydney Judge 1: He had 1 card less than he claimed. It's agaisnt the rules!
Sydney Judge 2: Look, do you want Sydney or Adelaide in the final?!
Sydney Judge 1: Sydney.
Syndey Judge 2: Then let it go.
Pascal is not penalised. He goes to the final and wins 2-0 and this is National Champion. Sydney UDE representative says: Thank god Syndye won and not some ejrk from Adelaide or Perth!
Is this fair?! NO! This is blatant blurring of the rules!
So I make this plea:
1. Fellow duelists, do not let Pascal and Upperdeck get away with this! THIS IS WRONG AND AGAINST WHAT THE GAME STANDS FOR!
2. Darkyouth, I take back what I said before. CREAM THE LITTLE BASTARD!
3. If you ever meet him, don't give him the satisfaction of thinking he's good.
4. My friend taped the whole duel and aftermath on his video camera. e have physical proof of what happened.
I am sickend by the whole thing. SO much for fair duelling.
Darkyouth, ebat him and win the worlds...please!
HE CHEATED! AND THE JUDGES KNEW AND INTENTIONALLY LET HIM GET AWAY WITH IT!
What happened:
In the previous match, Pascall's opponent, Cory, still has Pascal's Magical Scientist, in his deck.
Pascal duels my friend Jason in the semis. Pascal wins 2-1. After duel, Cory coems up and says he had Pascal's Magical Scientist in his deck. Pascal says yes, it wasn't in his deck, and that he didn't replace it with another card, therefore having 40 isntead of 41 cards. Therefore Pascal had 1 less card than he claimed. 15 other people that day got an automatic 1st duel loss for similiar incidences. What happens to Pascal?
Judge discussion:
Sydney Judge 1: He had 1 card less than he claimed. It's agaisnt the rules!
Sydney Judge 2: Look, do you want Sydney or Adelaide in the final?!
Sydney Judge 1: Sydney.
Syndey Judge 2: Then let it go.
Pascal is not penalised. He goes to the final and wins 2-0 and this is National Champion. Sydney UDE representative says: Thank god Syndye won and not some ejrk from Adelaide or Perth!
Is this fair?! NO! This is blatant blurring of the rules!
So I make this plea:
1. Fellow duelists, do not let Pascal and Upperdeck get away with this! THIS IS WRONG AND AGAINST WHAT THE GAME STANDS FOR!
2. Darkyouth, I take back what I said before. CREAM THE LITTLE BASTARD!
3. If you ever meet him, don't give him the satisfaction of thinking he's good.
4. My friend taped the whole duel and aftermath on his video camera. e have physical proof of what happened.
I am sickend by the whole thing. SO much for fair duelling.
Darkyouth, ebat him and win the worlds...please!