...that's productivity. I now have all my drafts in various stages of completion too, but a) they currently suck and b) I'm paranoid about tutors sticking phrases into Google and thinking I'm plagiarising myself so they're waiting for the end of semester.
I'm glad I'm not workshopping you. What to say? And you say this isn't real poetry. If you wanted to impress someone you could say the set was about position, juxtaposition and straitjacketed monotony in contemporary Australian values. It's real poetry, whatever that means. (I hope you don't take that as an insult.)
Every poem in the set fits together really well (with the possible exception of the second poem, but I like how it stands out, a breath of fresh air in the monotony). In fact, I'd say the first poem and "Riffed" fit together so well it could be said they were repeating the same thing, especially with the repeated images such as trampoline dreaming. But I think "Riffed" has a much greater sense of determination to reject the stereotypes and accept both stereotypical masculinity and everything else as a part of 'you'. So it's cool. That said, reading five poems with the same in-your-face message gets pretty tiriing. By "WE MUST BAN ALCOHOL ADVERTISING ON TV,
RADIO AND ANY FORM OF PRINT MEDIA", I was like "okay, I get the bloody point already!", despite the poem working well on its own and raising points about how easy it is to just give in. Is it possible for poems to fit together too well?
The images in the first poem are lovely. Except for line 20. I got really vivid images for all the other lines, but this drew a blank for me. Maybe a more action-based image like midnight conversations in French (and) would work better. Actually, line 30 drew a blank for the same reason; it was also kind vague. About the fuzz, I reckon it doesn't need to be pointed out that it's incoherent. It's like you're analysing the poem for me.
Poem 2: My tutor would love the couplets; are the first four lines' non-couplet-ness supposed to reflect the incompleteness before the boy? Once again, great images. I especially like the second line and the exclamation mark. "Course" should be "coursed". In line 7, "so tired from being" seems redundant.
Puppetslave: ...bring on the formatting. It makes it almost like a computer interface. At the risk of being a broken record, vividly real. Some of the statements, such as "swallow dream and become rich" and "...die alone" could be expressed more originally though.
We Must...: Aforesaid irritation sinks in at this point because the father's voice is really cliched. But strong. And effective. So I'm mixed on this. Maybe toss in some statements with more personal quirk along with the stereotypical "What d’you mean you’ve had enough?"s? I really like Part 2.
Riffed: ha, take that, sucker! Yeah, you could call this a circular ending, but in a more determined and self-assured place. The form is close to the first poem's, which I guess is the reason I found them overlapping at first, but they're not, really. I really like the references to Happy Parents and inhibiting art. Perhaps "To reject what I find one-eyed" would flow better. But I wasn't sure whether I liked the ending. Perhaps it was the word 'infelicitous'. Maybe the line would be stronger with something positive (without prefix "in-".)
"Creative Writing: Ideas and Practice", be proud. I am now the master of bs. But really, I really enjoyed these poems. They're so... angrily real. I think 'cathartic' is the word I'm after. Good job.![]()