Review of “Pride Unbound”
Plot (17/20 points): The plot here was interesting, but it didn’t quite grab me in the way I would have hoped. Much of the story was spent explaining what was actually happening, giving various backstory details and such. Frankly, it may have been more effective to spend the first hundred words or so actually showing the events which kept getting referenced so that readers wouldn’t be in the dark. You may have been more efficient within the word count had you given the past in one section and the present in another rather than reverting back and forth; that may have ultimately allowed you to give more details that would have helped the reader grasp the situation.
As it was, there was a lot to digest all at once, and it didn’t always come through clearly. Nonetheless, from what could be discerned, it was a pretty good idea with some curious twists and both personal and interpersonal struggles.
Plot Originality (8/10 points): It’s not like I haven’t seen similar stories before – someone is exposed to a foreign entity that envelops and ultimately overwhelms the individual. This was done uniquely enough, though.
Writing Style (16/20 points): I would have liked a bit more explanation of what was actually happening with Shepard. The narrative jumped around a little bit between introspection and external interactions. That’s not such a problem if the reader can keep up with what’s happening, but since the scenario was still being established even in the end, it was much more difficult to track. For that matter, bouncing between four separate interaction types (Shepard-Chakwas, Shepard reflecting on the past, Shepard-Grunt, and Shepard-inner voice) was a little much to process when they came in such a rapid-fire manner. The goal may have been to throw the reader into a whirlwind like what Shepard herself was experiencing, but since we never had a clear foundation for the context it didn’t quite work.
Spelling and Grammar (7/10 points): There were some issues here. I didn’t see any especially severe errors, but there were enough missing words and punctuation miscues and typos in a small space that those mistakes were especially noticeable. For instance, semicolons and commas were, at times, used inconsistently, and on a number of occasions periods ended quotations when commas would have been more appropriate. Phrases like “crashing into wall” were also clearly unintentional errors.
Characters (12/15 points): There were a fair number of characters here, and we never got particularly close to any of them. Grunt was about as well-developed as Shepard herself was. While there were some allusions to differences between Shepard’s past self and her new, twisted demeanor, the change never felt adequately expressed, especially since we never had any real information about what Shepard did during the interrogation. Her current self was clear enough, but the shift was never quite there.
Settings (13/15 points): This helped you quite a bit. The little context we were able to grasp came from the setting, not the characters themselves. Specifically, the details about Shepard’s destruction of her quarters and of the photograph – physically representing her connection to her old self – were quite enlightening. Without some more characterization, this alone wasn’t enough to set the scene, but it was at least helpful.
Overall Appreciation (9/10 points): I liked what you were trying to do here. It missed on a few key elements, so there wasn’t quite the connection with Shepard that you may have wanted, but a kernel of great quality was certainly evident in this piece nonetheless.
Final Result: 82/100 = 82%
Closing Comments: Your overall idea was pretty good, and I think that with a bit more development of the background it could really hit home. To be blunt, we almost didn’t need the internal dialogue at the end; Shepard’s external behavior was actually more effective in conveying the point. More of that misbehavior or more backstory (provided explicitly instead of in recollections) may have been a lot more helpful than bringing in an additional voice. I’d rather like to see this piece rewritten with more of that flavor, actually, just to see how it feels. Living through both sides of Shepard could provide a much more interesting contrast than living through one side that is only remembering the other.