perhaps romney should not have started by saying something that he later would have to change his position on?

this is kind of a constant problem for him - pointing this sort of thing out will be a pretty substantial part of the anti-romney campaign

but anyway this particular subject arises due to the one-year anniversary and the fact that this event was a substantial boon to obama's approval rating when it initially happened

have we already forgotten 2004? if you say or do anything at all critical of military operations, you get destroyed for being weak and indecisive while your opponent takes the credit