Again, Martin, I wasn't the one who did it.

Since the point of a hidden veto is to disallow any peer pressure about abolishing a trade, I can't obligate whoever vetoed it to disclose their identity. (Not that I have the power to do so anyway, but just so we're clear.) Still, if someone wants to admit it, that would take the pressure off us innocents.

*waits for someone to admit to the foul act*

In the meantime, I'm going to rip my hair out after scoring about 30 points below my projected total against the Thunder. AGAIN.


EDIT: Huh. It seems that "Pts Scored" against a defense doesn't include anything scored by the opposing defense.

And yet I still lost.

I could shoot myself for not starting Vick (25) or Baltimore (24) this week.

Heck, Elam (8) would've been better than Rackers (2), though not by enough.

And I'm sure my last benched player, Maroney, will put up a 30 or something...

Ugh.