Roy:
I admit it is slightly absurd, Bush isn't a rapist or murderer to the best of my knowledge. Still, both have committed crimes against humanity, and that is not debatable, because you and I both know that Bush knows and approves of secret prisons and detention without the right to a trial, and that is a crime against humanity under international law, forget even torture at Guantanamo (even though there are documents out tying torture at Guantanamo to Rumsfeld) or Abu Ghraib.

And deal with Iran? The UN has been doing all it can, but unfortunately the United States keeps screwing everything over by refusing to talk. Even when Iran wanted to talk about peace and stability with Iraq, the US was like "Nope, we don't recognize you, nah nah!". There's a precedent, look at China back during the Nixon era, it looked like another Cold War brewing, but just the simple act of diplomacy created a China that's now part of the global economy and what not. Why not try the same thing with Iran instead of just giving them the cold shoulder, because that is clearly failing miserably.
First thing I will say is that I have given you articles in the past that shows that no torture took place in Guitmo, YOU even admitted it. Second we have already acknowledged that your crimes against humanity is very very broad, you believe taking out a military target such as a Progpagnda run TV station is a Crime Against Humanity, even if there are no humans in it at the time.

As for Iran, have you just gone crazy man? Iran wanting to talk about Peace and Stabability in Iraq? Is this before or after we found Iranian arms given to Iraqi Insurgents? Is it before or after we found Iranian Military Officers in Iraq? Is it before or after Iran gave their border over to Al Qaeda so that they could smuggle militants in?

As for the UN doing all it can, is this the same UN that could not stop North Korea from making a nuke? Is this the same UN that used the oil for food program to give Saddam arms and money? Is this the same UN that is currently allowing Iran to be on the cusp of making a Nuke? Is this the same UN that made resolutions condeming Iran, but decided to have them watered down becuase Iranian's allies would not like it? Well is it? Becuase I am quite confused, right now the UN is a toothless tiger to deal with the big problems, not becuase of the US, not just becuase of China or Russia. But becuase they would rather sit around and debate instead of taking action.

And that my friends is why the UN is worthless.