
Originally Posted by
kurai
being able to debate an issue such as this in 2014 will be useful for the legitimacy of rule - the actual expansion under obama remains, the ongoing objection of russia remains. neither party has an absolute ground on which an opposition could take hold. if you hold an advantageous domestic position, being able to maintain such a position for the next election cycle is helpful (as in the united states). "russia getting everything it wants" is not actually what russian political operators want; authoritarian elite power only makes sense with an us-versus-them mindset. this is a mindset of the cold war, and it remains in the populace (for now), and thus the ability for continued saber-rattling in the future benefits the maintenance of power (as in russia).