2012 U.S. Presidential Election

[Roy Karrde]

What specific offence? Please cite exactly which law he has possibly broken.

That would be up to Congress to decide

Neither possibility of wrong doing nor the coincidence of the events being discussed mean there is a need for questions to be answered. Without any evidence that a) Obama has done anything wrong or b) there is a link between the date of the election and the announcement of the scandal, then this is no better than mere speculation. No one is required to answer for any wrongdoing that some speculate they may have committed if there is no evidence of any wrongdoing having taken place. I'm not defending Obama, but generally speaking no one is required to respond to wild speculation unless their position becomes untenable without an account of their actions. The President's position is, for now, quite tenable.

You realize that Congress does not need a shred of evidence to create a investigation into something. Through their power of oversight of the executive branch they can create a investigation into anything. They could launch a investigation merely into Petraeus leaving, and force the White House to turn over documents and testimony on when the President found out about it.

Heald, he's just bitter.

How's that proof coming into Fox News' ratings?