Just going to repeat it in case it wasn't clear the first time: being able to see Russia from Alaska as governor of Alaska in no way shape or form qualifies Sarah Palin to have the foreign policy know how to be president regardless of what questionable things Russia pulls in its air space. There are things such as radar and telephone to communicate these sort of things so people don't have to camp out on a remote rock scoping out the ass hole wasteland of Russia. I don't even see what you're trying to argue here at this point, it's like you're just quoting my post and responding for the sake of smashing your keyboard and pounding out text in my direction. It was a terrible answer to an alright question, and that's it.
Sarah Palin is literally the worst and if she was elected to highest office it would just be George Bush 2 The Movie: Bush Harder.
But in other news, lets check this out:
The supreme court decided today that not allowing corporations (since they are legally ruled to be people, with individual rights) to have the limitless ability to make political campaign contributions is illegal.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012102223.html
Lawfully and technically it makes sense... but now the question is: in 2012 who are you voting for, Pepsi or Coke?