Oh, I give up, this is like arguing with...
Come to think of it, this is like arguing with a Republican, which I just realized is exactly what I'm doing.
Oh, I give up, this is like arguing with...
Come to think of it, this is like arguing with a Republican, which I just realized is exactly what I'm doing.
No, it's simply because no matter what I say, you're always prepared to counter it with some phoney-baloney opinion. You won't give up.
Here's some facts for you to consider when comparing Obama with Romney.
Mitt Romney loves to attack Barack Obama’s record of job creation as president. Unfortunately, Mitt’s record as Massachusetts governor pales in comparison.
Obama has created a net 3.635 million jobs. Applying the same rules to Romney’s numbers through the same time period—that is, through April of his fourth year in office, 2006—we credit Romney with 64,500 jobs.
So he grew jobs by 1.9 percent. (During a BOOM, I might add)
Obama’s job-growth rate is 2.35 percent (during a BUST, by the way)
Add to this the fact that Obama, being President, had a far bigger jurisdiction.
Who is the bigger job creator?
No opinion here. Just facts.
Last edited by Roy Karrde; 29th May 2012 at 04:59 PM.
Not sure. How many?
I take it you know?
So you say my numbers are flawed, but you don't know by how much, nor do you have anything to back your claim up with? You only "assume"?