2012 U.S. Presidential Election

[kurai]

I congratulate you on your newfound creation of a society of have-nots without end. Such is the consequence of caring about unemployment without any concern for material conditions.

Protected domestic growth? Certainly, this would never lead to domestic employment as has happened repeatedly throughout history as a consequence of interventionist industrialization. Instead, you have to generate a false dichotomy between two domestic groups in order to sustain your argument against unionization (the only actually created differentiation is between the consequences of your recommended downward spiral and the past [or future?] conditions of American manufacturing). Consider addressing historical-economic reality. You need both sides of the coin; capital and labour. You undermine the other by focusing only on the one, which is just unworkable (not to mention unrealistic).